Simple Water Purification
Shop : Purification Process Of Water
Home : Bottled Water VS Tap Water
Water Filtering System
Product Info : Carbon Filter
Products : Home Water Filter
News : Home Water Filter
Miscellaneous : Whole House Water Filters
Contact Us : Whole House Water Filtration Systems
Links : Drinking Water
Downloads : Sediment Filter
Simple Water Purification
Natural resources defense council  

Clean  Water & Oceans :Drinking Water :In Depth :Report


Executive Summary       Read Full Story

Every day more than 240 million of us in this country turn on our faucets in order to drink, bathe, and cook, using water from public water systems. And as  we do, we often take the purity of our tap water for granted. We shouldn't.  Before it comes out of our taps, water in most cities usually undergoes a  complex treatment process, often including filtration and disinfection. As good as our municipal water systems can be (and they can be very good), they also can fail -- sometimes tragically. In 1999, for example, more than 1,000 people fell ill at a county fair in upstate New York after ingesting an extremely virulent  strain of E. coli bacteria; a three-year-old girl and an elderly man died when their bodies could not fight off the pathogen.

So, just how safe is our drinking water?


In a careful and independent study, NRDC evaluated the quality of drinking water supplies in 19 cities around the country. NRDC selected cities that represent the broadest range of American city water supplies and reviewed tap water quality data, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)  compliance records, and water suppliers' annual reports (material required by law in order to inform citizens of the overall health of their tap water; also  called "right-to-know reports"). In addition, NRDC gathered information on pollution  sources that may contaminate the lakes, rivers, or underground aquifers that cities use as drinking water sources. Findings are issued grades for each city in three areas:

water quality and compliance
right-to-know reports
source water protection

NRDC found that, although drinking water purity has improved slightly during the past 15 years in most cities, overall tap water quality varies widely from city to city. Some cities like Chicago have excellent tap water; most cities have good or mediocre tap water. Yet several cities -- such as Albuquerque,  Fresno, and San Francisco -- have water that is sufficiently contaminated so as to pose potential health risks to some consumers, particularly to pregnant  women, infants, children, the elderly, and people with compromised immune  systems.

While tap water quality varies, there is one overarching truth that applies  to all U.S. cities: unless we take steps now, our tap water will get worse. Two  factors pose imminent threats to drinking water quality in America:

• First, we are relying on pipes that are, on average, a century old.

The water systems in many cities -- including Atlanta, Boston, and Washington, D.C. -- were built toward the end of the 19th century. Not only is our water  supply infrastructure breaking down at alarming rates (the nation suffered more  than 200,000 water main ruptures in 2002), but old pipes can leach contaminants and breed bacteria in drinking water.
 
• Second, regulatory and other actions by the Bushadministration threaten the purity of American tap water.

These actions include:

weakening  legislative protections for source waters, stalling on issuing new standards for  contaminants, delaying the strengthening of existing standards, and cutting and  even eliminating budgets for protective programs.

Water Quality and Compliance Findings
 
Healthy city water supplies in this country resemble each other in three distinct ways: they have good source water protection, treatment, and maintenance and operation of the system. Every problem water supply, however, is  unhealthy in its own way: it may fail in just one of the three discrete areas mentioned above, or it may have a combination of factors that contribute to the  system's ailments. Fresno, for example, has no source water protection; Newark  and San Francisco do not have adequate treatment systems in place; Atlanta has  poor maintenance of its distribution system. Any of these factors will introduce contaminants into the water.

Water Quality and  Compliance

Check your City

2001 Grade

Chicago

Excellent

Baltimore

Good

Denver

Good

Detroit

Good

Manchester

Good

New Orleans

Good

Atlanta

Fair

Houston

Fair

Los Angeles

Fair

Newark

Fair

Philadelphia

Fair

San Diego

Fair

Seattle

Fair

Washington, D.C

Fair

Albuquerque

Poor

Boston

Poor

Fresno

Poor

Phoenix

Poor

San Francisco

Poor


A Handful of Contaminants Found in Most Cities

NRDC observed that while tap water can contain a vast array of contaminants, a handful of particularly harmful contaminants surfaced repeatedly in our study. They  include:

Lead , which enters drinking water supplies from the corrosion of pipes or  faucets and can cause permanent brain damage and decreased intelligence in infants and children

Pathogens
(germs) such as coliform bacteria or Cryptosporidium, a  microscopic disease-carrying protozoan that presents health concerns, especially  to individuals with weakened immune systems including HIV/AIDS patients, the  elderly, children, and people who have undergone organ transplants or cancer chemotherapy or who have certain chronic diseases.

By-products
of the chlorination process such as trihalomethanes and  haloacetic acids, which may cause cancer and, potentially, reproductive problems and miscarriage.

Several other carcinogens and other toxic chemicals, including arsenic (which is naturally occurring or derives from mining and industrial processes),  radioactive radon, the pesticide atrazine (affecting the water of more than 1  million Americans), and perchlorate from rocket fuel (present in the water supplies of more than 20 million Americans).

Few Violations, Often Weak Standards

Overall, NRDC's study revealed a relatively small number of cities that were in outright violation of national standards. This fact did not necessarily imply  low contaminant levels but rather low standards: in short, the EPA  has written most standards in a way that the vast majority of cities will not be  in violation.

Aging Infrastructure Causes More Spikes in Contamination

Finally, NRDC's study revealed an increase in the frequency of periodic  spikes in contamination in many cities -- indicating that aging equipment and infrastructure may be inadequate to handle today's contaminant loads or spills. On occasion, these risks were substantial. In recent years, for example,  Atlanta, Baltimore, and Washington, D.C., issued boil-water alerts as a result  of problems including spikes in turbidity (cloudiness, which may indicate the  presence of disease-causing pathogens) or other potential microbial problems.  And in Washington, D.C., levels of cancer-causing trihalomethanes -- which potentially cause cancer, birth defects, and miscarriages -- peaked at more than  double the EPA standard. (It is noteworthy that while Washington, D.C., recently changed its treatment to mitigate such spikes, many other cities continue to suffer from them.) While aggressive action in each city has lowered those  levels, spikes in contaminants may pose immediate health problems to  particularly susceptible people.

Recommendations

NRDC makes three major recommendations to improve water quality and  compliance.

First, NRDC recommends that this country invest in infrastructure to upgrade deteriorating water systems and modernize treatment techniques.

Second, NRDC recommends that investment be earmarked not just for old  pipes but also for upgrading drinking water treatment.

Third, NRDC recommends that the EPA strengthen and enforce existing health standards that are too weak, and draft and enforce new standards for those  contaminants that remain unregulated. Specifically, we recommend that the  EPA:

Issue new standards for:
• perchlorate
• radon
• distribution systems
• groundwater microbes
• other emerging contaminants (see Chapter 5)

Strengthen existing standards for:
• arsenic
• atrazine/total triazines
• chromium
• Cryptosporidium and other pathogens
• fluoride
• haloacetic acids
• lead
• total trihalomethanes

Vulnerable Consumers Need to Take Special Precautions.

It is critical  to note that the recommendations above describe long-term solutions to improve overall drinking water quality in this country. For those people who have  immediate concerns about tap water safety, NRDC brings to the fore EPA  recommendations as follows: people with serious immune system problems (such as  people on cancer chemotherapy or people with HIV/AIDS) should consult with their  health care providers about drinking tap water in order to avoid the risk of infection from contaminated water. Pregnant women and infants may also be at  special risk from certain contaminants common in many cities' tap water, such as lead, nitrates, and chlorine by-products.

 

Nrdc
Bottle
NSF
 


SHOP HOME WATER PRODUCT INFO PRODUCTS NEWS/EVENTS

MISCELLANEOUS CONTACT US LINKS DOWNLOADS SITE MAP

Copyright © 2004 Rain Forest Water Systems. All Rights Reserved.